Global Flood? Is there evidence?


Have you ever heard the cliché you are missing the forest for the trees?  Or is it the other way around? The tree for the forest?  In either case, this cliché could apply to earth and the flood geology evidence that surrounds us on earth.   Whether you believe in the biblical account of the flood of Noah, or if there once was a flood of global catastrophe different that one as described in the bible, then either way there would be plenty of evidence to support this devastating event.  The evidence would be found on every continent on a massive scale.  The flood waters would have covered even the highest mountain peaks.

Was the global flood of the bible a mere analogy? Or perhaps it is a myth handed down over generations, or did it really happen?  Unfortunately, either way, the evidence alone will not answer this question because no one can go back in time and observe things that occurred in the past.  All we can do today is look to the evidence and try to determine if a global flood likely happened or perhaps the evidence is lacking.  Does the evidence we find today support the account in the bible of the earth having ever been flooded on a global scale?

Uniformitarianism vs. Catastrophism

A common saying among geologists is ‘the present is the key to the past’.  Meaning what we observe today is likely the way it has always been for all time.  Essentially slow and gradual processes with perhaps a catastrophe like an earthquake or a tsunami here or there, but, overall slow and steady.  This is called a uniformitarian view.  Uniformitarianism applies present day observed rates (such as erosion) to all or most geologic, fossil, and radiometric evidence.

By contrast, catastrophism is a doctrine that sees present day evidence as not the answer to much of the geologic, fossil, or radiometric evidence we find today.  This views present day processes as occurring at significantly slower rates than those observed by past catastrophic events of the past.

An excellent example that stands in contrast to uniformitarianism is the observation and measurement of  the erosion rate at Niagara Falls.  Data shows that the Falls are eroding at about one foot per year.  However, when uniformitarian views are applied to this observation several problems arise.  First, the falls are much too young to have always eroded at this rate for all time.   Secondly, they have no answer for all the water that remains but is not replenished by rain and rivers, the water is a runoff of a massive scale.

For the catastrophic perspective many elements of Niagara Falls suggest a past catastrophe.  The catastrophic view would agree that erosion today is much slower than the past—much, much slower.  In fact, there is so much water crushing through Horseshoe Falls that it is estimated that the total water still held would cover the entire continent of North American better than three feet deep.

However, this water is not being replenished- why is it there?  Where did it come from?   It is thought that the great lakes are remnants of the ice age.  It is speculated by scientists that in about 2,000 years the falls could be completely dry.

Mount Saint Helens

In the aftermath of the massive volcanic explosion which occurred at 8:32 AM Sunday morning on May 18, 1980 Mount Saint Helens  became an active laboratory for observable catastrophism science.  This event transformed many scientist’s uniformitarian views as they witnessed and recorded on video bad lands being formed in mere days.  Massive canyons were dug hundreds of feet deep in a single day all while sedimentary layers were laid over twelve feet thick in hours.  Over two years over one hundred feet of solid rock was cut through as erosion formed a new canyon.

“Little Grand Canyon” of Mount Saint Helens

Three separate eruptions produced sedimentary layers’ hundreds of feet thick.  One of these eruptions was at hurricane velocity, it produced thousands of thin lamination up to twenty-five feet thick.  All with highly refined layers.  The third and final eruption of this catastrophe involved a lava flow.  This flow became a hot mud-flow which pressed crossed the Toutle River.  This hot mud flow etched through the river and carved out seventeen miles of canyons as deep as one hundred and forty feet.  This lava flow completed this in a matter of hours.  Today this seventeen-mile canyon is called the “Little Grand Canyon of the Toutle River” in striking similarity to the Grand Canyon.

The catastrophe of Mount Saint Helens shows us what havoc a regional catastrophe can render in a very short period of time.  If a geologist was being honest, they would admit that without witnessing the eruption of Mount Saint Helens they would assume the canyons were over millions of years not hours.  Mount Saint Helens stands as a powerful testament to the power of even a local catastrophe on geologic landscapes.

Global Flood Evidence?

If there was a global flood what evidence would we expect to find?  We would expect to find erosion of solid rock and soils over vast continents.  We would find sedimentary pulverized fragments of rock and oceanic materials to be spread over vast areas and re-deposited.  We would expect to find vast sedimentary run offs would be found from when the waters receded reforming the dry land.  We would see massive re-depositing of materials spanning great distances away, laying sediment, bending vast layers as being laid down while still wet, leaving massive layers without any evidence of plant, insect, or living things.  Layers as massive burial grounds rich in dead plants and animal fossils.  We would see these fossils and remains even on the highest mountain peaks.  These evidences are exactly what we find on earth today.


Fossil Graveyard at Carnegie Museum

Fossils can be formed in a multitude of ways.  Specimens can be frozen, dried, asphalted, amber, or carbon distillation.  Some fossils are only imprints while others are the actual remains.  The fact is there are billions of fossils and nearly all of them are oceanic.  Of all fossils 95% are marine, 4.75% are algae and plants, .25% are invertebrates, .0125% are fish, the balance are vertebrates which include dinosaur fossils where 95% of those specimens have less than one bone.  95% of all mammal fossils come from the ice age or post flood era.  Many dinosaur exhibits are 99% replication and assumption and less than 1% actual evidence.  These are all created by water caught in sedimentary layers and then later dried as the waters receded.  In spite of all these fossils, fossilization is not common.  In fact, it never occurs under normal decay processes.  The evidence of fossils alone indicated mass sedimentation being laid down by even more massive bodies of water.  If these fossils were created in a global flood event this is what we would expect to find and again this is exactly what we do find.

Fossils on highest mountain tops

Additionally, geological strata contain marine fossils as critical evidence that the ocean once covered the continents, even the highest continental areas. Extremely widespread strata blankets argue for an intercontinental or global flood. For example, most of the rock layers in the walls of Grand Canyon (more than a mile above sea level) contain marine fossils.  Fossilized shellfish are even found in the Himalayas.  If we had a global flood we would expect to find fossils even on the tops of the highest mountains and again, this is what we find.

Polystrate Fossils

A polystrate fossil is a tree standing straight up through the rock layers of sediment which are thought by the evolutionists to represent many millions of years of layers.  Some polystrate tree fossils could not have grown in the location where the surrounding shale was deposited, since trees don’t live long under the sea.

Polystrate Tree Fossil cutting through supposed millions of years of oceanic shale


For this burial is supposed as having been completed very slowly, over millions of years.  During this time billions of tiny shale-sized particles are deposited slowly layer by layer.  Then heat and pressure covered these fossil trees.

Using uniformitarian principles, the time required for shale sediments to accumulate summed to many thousands of years.  The evidence indicates that the shale was deposited quickly over the trees still standing upright during a catastrophe.  Many of these trees were buried at the same time when all the rock layers were yet still liquid.  Polystrate fossils are found all around the world and are yet additional evidence for a global flood.

Coal Beds & Rapid Burial of plants and animals

We find extensive fossil “graveyards” which some are exquisitely preserved.  For example, billions of nautili fossils are found in a layer within the Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon.   The chalk and coal beds of Europe and the United States, and the fish, ichthyosaurs, insects, and other fossils all around the world, testify of catastrophic destruction and burial.

Fossil Forests

The Stone Desert is a well known European tourist attraction

The world has many petrified forests found on nearly every continent on earth.  The Petrified Forest is known for its fossils, especially fallen trees that lived in the Late Triassic Period, supposedly about 225 million years ago.  The sediments containing the fossil logs are part of the widespread and colorful formation from where the Painted Desert of Arizona got its name.  If petrification of wood operated independently of animal fossilization, why are the two always found together?  The evidence indicates it could be because they were both laid down rapidly by water at the same time.

Sedimentary Rock layers

Tapeats Sandstone spans North America and most other continents on earth

Granular, water-charged sediment flows result in very rapid stratification. We find rock layers that can be traced all the way across continents—even between continents—and physical features in those strata indicate they were deposited rapidly.  Concentrated sediment flows produce thick strata sequences by abrupt deposition from liquefied suspension or evenly bedded strata by flow transformation to a tractive current.

Erosion or no erosion

We find evidence of rapid erosion, or even of no erosion, between rock layers. Flat, knife-edge boundaries between rock layers indicate continuous deposition of one layer after another, with no time for erosion.

For example, there is no evidence of any “missing” millions of years (of erosion) in the flat boundary between two well-known layers of Grand Canyon—the Coconino Sandstone and the Hermit Formation.  Another impressive example of flat boundaries at Grand Canyon is the Redwall Limestone and the strata beneath it.

Sediments transported great distances

We find that the sediments in those widespread, rapidly deposited rock layers had to be eroded from distant sources and carried long distances by fast-moving water. For example, the sand for the Coconino Sandstone of Grand Canyon (Arizona) had to be eroded and transported from the northern portion of what is now the United States and Canada. Furthermore, water current indicators (such as ripple marks) preserved in rock layers show that for “300 million years” water currents were consistently flowing from northeast to southwest across all of North and South America, which, of course, is only possible over weeks during a global Flood.

Sorting of layers

Experiments from the Colorado State University utilized modern technology.  Scientists took place in large glass-walled flumes, which allowed observation and filming from above and through the sides of the tanks.  Different sized particles of sand were poured into water circulating in the flume. Variations in current velocity caused the particles to be sorted according to size. The accumulation of sediment produced a deposit consisting of the downstream part of the lower laminae, part of the sloping stratum of larger particles, and the upstream part of the upper laminae. Each individual deposit formed successively downstream and was therefore younger than the one before it. Variations in current velocity, as found in rivers and oceans, could thus cause deposits to form both vertically and laterally at the same time in the direction of the current.

This and other experiments have demonstrated the mechanical nature of stratification, whereby: (a) Particles segregated according to their size when transported by a current of variable velocity by water or some other force; (b) Desiccation, or drying out, of deposits caused bedding partings; (c) Stratification of the deposit, under both dry and wet conditions, formed parallel to the slope of the deposit.(1)

These laboratory experiments have shown that spontaneous
sorting and layering occurs with a sand, mud and clay slurry and are sorted by size. 
When the mixture slows down, the sand, mud and clay will spontaneously precipitate (or settle out) and form individual layers.  This event was witnessed first hand at the Mount Saint Helens eruption as massive layers were laid down by mud flows over a few afternoons.

Many strata laid in rapid succession: Bent Rock layers

In many mountainous areas, rock layers’ thousands of feet thick have been bent and folded without fracturing. How can that happen if they were laid down separately over hundreds of millions of years and already hardened?  Hello?  Rocks do not normally bend; they break because they are hard and brittle.

However, in many places around the globe we find entire sequences of solid rock strata bent without fracturing.  This evidence indicates that all the rock layers were rapidly deposited and folded while still wet and pliable before final hardening.  For example, the Tapeats Sandstone in Grand Canyon is folded at a right angle (90°) without evidence of breaking. Yet this folding could only have occurred after the rest of the layers had been deposited, supposedly over “480 million years,” while the Tapeats Sandstone remained wet and pliable.  The region around Grand Canyon is a great example showing how most of the earth’s fossil-bearing layers were laid down quickly and many were folded while still wet.


The evidence for a global flood having occurred in the past is overwhelming.  Every area of evidence supports the possibility of a global flood as described in the bible.  Many areas of evidence are only created by massive waters which include fossils, polystrate trees, bent rock layers, and coal formation.  Again, we cannot go back and confirm the account of the bible but we can certainly review the data and conclude that the possibility abounds based on the review of the evidence.




Leave Comment